No Holds Barred General

Ricky_von_Pianti

0
Disreputable member
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Posts
55
Rep Power
-38
Gab sucks, because it took the format of Twitter/X and re-implemented it, while subverting the ultimate end of the format, which is to foster communities. By making Gab explicitly political (and furthermore explicitly right-wing), Torba (who is a good dude) took the first step towards ensuring Gab fails. Wignat's have the same problem, wherein they've got a contrived worldview that they try to superimpose on top of systems they are beholden to (what I mean by this is they mistake a subsystem of the human system as a closed system in and of itself--finance is a subset of the human system and bad financial analysis ignores this).

What you end up with is people with a very flimsy, two-dimensional mode of processing information, as reality quickly presents them with things that don't lend themselves to an explanation in terms they're familiar with. A wignat doesn't understand the intrinsic value of young men sitting around making fun of each other, calling each other gay, being mean to each other, getting in fights--that seems like a waste of time and Evola wasn't brought up even a single time!? They mistakenly think that brotherhood forms from shared highfalutin concepts, and not from very natural, very human, simple proximal interations. Simply put, Wignats don't really understand nature, and presume to know better (despite claiming to worship it).

This is why people need to rally behind NHB and do what they can to support it. Yes, it's a show with some sort of planning and production, but it's not a contrivance. It's clear Dalton thought to himself "I'm making a show" and not "I'm making an American First outlet" (at least explicitly). Likeminded people throughout history end up in pubs, cafes, park benches, etc. It's not the park bench that facilitates the sharing of likeminded ideas--it's the people sitting on the park bench. However, It helps if the bench is enjoyable to sit on. Only a true retard buys black rifle coffee because it "agrees with their beliefs", regular people just want coffee, and they want to talk about a multitude of things with each other. Each random thing a potential tendril of brotherhood seeking a counterpart.

NHB is important because it's a forum that is conducive to those simple interactions that foster brotherhood between people in a way that goes beyond crudely constructed ideology. Using the tide as an example, small tucked away pockets that trap the receding tide foster new life as the materia for life is naturally coelesced in a sequestered area. When the tide comes in that same materia, having conglomerated in some fashion, spreads out. When we get behind stuff like NHB, we're giving nature a chance to work it's magic, and we're putting our faith in a system that knows better than us.
You made me look up highfalutin
congratulations

Spot on analysis as NHB being the locker room or park where culture is formed by guys in free time hour. Gab systems analogy didn’t land and is overcomplicated
 

bemis

33334
Low rep power
Joined
Mar 7, 2024
Posts
74
Rep Power
133
You made me look up highfalutin
congratulations

Spot on analysis as NHB being the locker room or park where culture is formed by guys in free time hour. Gab systems analogy didn’t land and is overcomplicated
I was just sperging out about the show, I can't promise a landing when I'm really just spouting off

Maybe another way to think about it though, would be to go back to finance again. Lets say I'm simulating a securities market, and each security is a reliable random-walk algorithm for randomized output, such that securities go up and down in a fashion similar to real life. Someone who is bad at running simulations, would say "I want to effect this simulation by putting my finger on the scales" (a constraint of sorts). The wiser option would be to say "I want to interpret simulation data to reflect a particular scenario" (looking for emergent properties). Put even simpler, A bad simulator writes over his simulation as it runs, the wise simulator reads and interprets from his simulation as it runs.

Superior systems form from emergent properties over time, systems bound to collapse are ones laden with arbitrary constraints. It's a kind of negative space thing on the artist's canvas. Or seeing the man in the marble before a chisel is set to it.

Maybe what I'm really trying to say is that the Right Wing outside of AF has a lobotomized imagination.
 

Ricky_von_Pianti

0
Disreputable member
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Posts
55
Rep Power
-38
I was just sperging out about the show, I can't promise a landing when I'm really just spouting off

Maybe another way to think about it though, would be to go back to finance again. Lets say I'm simulating a securities market, and each security is a reliable random-walk algorithm for randomized output, such that securities go up and down in a fashion similar to real life. Someone who is bad at running simulations, would say "I want to effect this simulation by putting my finger on the scales" (a constraint of sorts). The wiser option would be to say "I want to interpret simulation data to reflect a particular scenario" (looking for emergent properties). Put even simpler, A bad simulator writes over his simulation as it runs, the wise simulator reads and interprets from his simulation as it runs.

Superior systems form from emergent properties over time, systems bound to collapse are ones laden with arbitrary constraints. It's a kind of negative space thing on the artist's canvas. Or seeing the man in the marble before a chisel is set to it.

Maybe what I'm really trying to say is that the Right Wing outside of AF has a lobotomized imagination.
Inductive vs. Deductive, gotcha

TGIF
 

Don Patch

11122
Staff member
High rep power
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Posts
2,394
Rep Power
2,078

$lave

11222
Staff member
High rep power
Joined
Apr 16, 2023
Posts
2,158
Rep Power
1,372
ya same i took the background 4 the html from heaven's gate's site
 
Top