Daily Stormer Weekend Round Up #4
Russia Encouraging Allies to Stop Trading in Dollars and Euros, Embrace the Future
See, this is the looming collapse.
Once the dollar falls out, the whole thing falls out.
Russia should increase settlements in national currencies with partner countries, Denis Manturov, head of the Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade, said at the plenary session of the Innoprom international exhibition in Uzbekistan on Monday.
He was addressing countries within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), of which Russia is a member.
According to the minister, in 2021, the growth of Russia’s trade turnover with partners within these associations amounted to about 38%, while together these unions make up roughly half of the global economy. According to Manturov, the future of their successful cooperation depends on how fast Russia’s partners move away from the US dollar and the euro toward national currencies in mutual settlements.
“What is happening today in the global economy and in the world gives us a hint about how we need to rebuild our logistics, industrial cooperation, in what directions we can develop our economies. This [is] de-dollarization, and now we have added de-euroization, that is, the transition to our own currencies in order to be as independent as possible in terms of mutual settlements,” Manturov said.
This is why Elon Musk and others he represents in Silicon Valley think they can make a power play and seize control. When the dollar falls out, people are going to adopt Bitcoin on a mass scale (probably), which will mean that certain right-wingish Silicon Valley people have all the money (they have a lot of Bitcoin) and they can replace the government.
I don’t think that will work. Probably, society will just totally collapse.
But hey, who knows?
TOTAL ARYAN VICTORY: Elon Seals Deal, Now Supreme Leader of Twitter
Total Aryan Victory.
Billionaire Elon Musk has reached an agreement to acquire Twitter for approximately $44 billion, the company said.
The outspoken Tesla CEO, the world’s wealthiest person, has said he wants to buy Twitter because he thinks it’s not living up to its potential as a platform for “free speech.” He says it needs to be transformed as a private company in order to build trust with users and do better at serving what he calls the “societal imperative” of free speech.
Twitter said it will become a privately held company after the sale is closed.
Promises have been made. We will demand they be fulfilled.
But right now, I’m just satisfied with the leftist freakout. That freaky Paki is preparing to resign today.
Of course, by rights we should all be restored to our rightful places in the town square.
The boys are back in the town square.
I’ll be there day one, friends.
See y’all faggots on the Moon.
🚀💫♥️ Yesss!!! ♥️💫🚀 pic.twitter.com/0T9HzUHuh6
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 25, 2022
Original article follows.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
But this is what they’re saying.
Twitter’s board is negotiating with CEO Elon Musk over his bid to buy the social media platform and a deal could be announced as early as Monday, according to media reports.
Twitter and Musk negotiated into the early hours Monday over his bid to buy the social media platform, The New York Times reported, less than two weeks after the billionaire first revealed a massive stake.
Musk said last week that he had lined up $46.5 billion in financing to buy Twitter, putting pressure on the company’s board to negotiate a deal.
The Times, citing people with knowledge of the situation who it did not identify, said the two sides were discussing details including a timeline and fees if an agreement was signed and then fell apart. The people said the situation was fluid and fast-moving.
Shares of Twitter Inc. rose 4% at the opening bell.
The Times could be reporting fake news for their own purposes, of course.
No one has any idea until it happens.
Then when it does happen, we don’t know what Elon will actually do.
Remember when he endorsed Bitcoin and then prematurely ejaculated in his own pants?
It’s good to be hopeful I guess, but there is no way free speech is going to be allowed on Twitter – not until the regime in Washington is a lot weaker than it is now, at least.
So either the deal doesn’t happen or after the deal does happen something else happens to prevent Elon from doing what he said he was going to do. I think he legit wants to do what he’s saying he wants to do – he and other marginal elites in Silicon Valley don’t like this psycho direction things are going and they are also smelling blood in the water. There’s no reason to believe this isn’t exactly what it appears to be – an attempt at a hostile takeover of the Western establishment by a sane remnant of the elite that thinks it can appeal to populism and seize power.
Elon’s first attempt at this play was with Bitcoin, and again – semen all in his jeans.
But don’t lose hope.
Always hope for the best, even if it seems impossible.
Are You Ready for Alex Jones?
Elon Musk and Twitter employee reinstate Alex Jones’s account live on Joe Rogan’s podcast: pic.twitter.com/BWR8EGJXfz
— Damon imani🔅 (@damonimani) April 26, 2022
Is it really actually happening?
It feels like a dream.
I’m waiting to make my new account, because apparently Twitter mods are doing a “last watch” and still banning returning heroes.
Did they already ban some of the returning heroes?
YOU WON’T HAVE THAT ABILITY MUCH LONGER, LOSER TWITTER MODS!
BETTER START FILING OUT THAT UNEMPLOYMENT PAPERWORK!
— Ethan Ralph (@TheRalphRetort) April 26, 2022
There is no “except for Anglin” clause in Elon’s pitch, and at this point, he is in so deep there is no reason to back down. So yes, of course I’m making an account.
Tomorrow, I’m going to try to draw up something like an official proposal on block list subscriptions to create “safe spaces” for people who are afraid of having their feelings hurt. The original and initial claim for the bannings at Twitter was “harassment,” which was actually “people saying mean things that allegedly hurt people’s feelings.” Allowing people to subscribe to block lists to block out all right-wing content from their feed is the solution to this. Twitter already has block lists, but they’re fan-made, so if Elon introduces a new one he can say “anyone who is worried about seeing mean words or being misgendered can subscribe to one of the block lists to protect themselves from speech they feel is dangerous to their personal mental health.”
After that, there aren’t any real issues. The “hate speech” arguments are ridiculous, and the only way they made this work was appealing to hurt feelings.
The media is calling for Congress to pass laws to prevent free speech.
The E.U. adopted new measures that require big online platforms to police hate speech and disinformation only days before Twitter entered into an agreement to sell the company to Elon Musk. https://t.co/niy0kya1Rk
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) April 26, 2022
They call it “harmful content.”
They are going to run stories of women and colored people being driven towards suicide by internet bullies, and putting in the block list mutes this completely. “Anyone can subscribe to any of the various levels of block list to protect themselves as they see fit.”
Also, people are saying Elon wants everyone’s ID card to post – he’s not saying that.
🚀💫♥️ Yesss!!! ♥️💫🚀 pic.twitter.com/0T9HzUHuh6
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 25, 2022
He’s just saying that people who are real people can get their blue checks universally if they want them. The background on this is long and probably not known to people who weren’t directly involved in it, but the blue check mark – which was originally just designed to prove that some account was the official account of some person or organization – has been used politically. Before people were banned, they often lost their blue check, and it was like “wait so are you saying you’re no longer sure this is the official account of the person in question?”
Then of course there are a bunch of rando journalists no one has ever heard of who want blue checks and don’t get them because Twitter never made an effort to give anyone who asks for a check a check. So there will be some automated process of scanning your ID card or passport, instead of a team of Indians deciding if you deserve a check.
That doesn’t have anything to do with anon accounts. It’s a totally different subject. Nothing Elon has said has implied that you will be required to give an ID to post if you just want to post anonymously.
I think this is really happening, and the only possible thing that will stop it at this point is if Elon is thrown in prison or Congress rushes through some kind of hate speech legislation and the Supreme Court ends the First Amendment.
The extreme antibody reaction from those who fear free speech says it all
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 26, 2022
Nick Fuentes on RT!
I was lobbying for Nick Fuentes to go on Indian TV, and then he comes out with this – RT!
He’s done multiple interviews in the last 10 days or so, but they just keep playing these minute long segments. The latest clip has a round table where he gets more facetime. It’s about Elon Musk buying Twitter and about free speech in general.
As I’ve said: he would actually be getting more viewers on Indian TV, but RT is Russian and Russia is a better country than India, even though Indian media is much better than Russian media.
I still think Nick should start going on Indian TV. I think he would be very popular very quickly, and would end up as a regular on Arnab rapidly. Arnab has big guests, but he also just has rando millennials from Moscow who don’t really have great English and just laugh at American Jew professors spreading goofy atrocity propaganda.
Nick on Indian TV would be a lot more interesting for the fans as well.
Clips from Indian TV are always epic, and it really fits the America First vibe, I think. All Nick has to do to get on Indian TV is contact them and show he’s a public person in America, and he’d like to defend Moscow’s position. Now, of course, he can send these RT clips, and just go on immediately.
This is the craziest two minutes interview you will see about the Russia war with Ukraine, hosted by Indian TV. The end is epically hilarious 🤦🏾♂️🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣#UkraineRussianWar #RussiaUkraineWar pic.twitter.com/PgOdxaWefM
— Chika Ezeabiama 🇳🇬🇬🇧 (@ps6811) March 3, 2022
Project Veritas Publishes Leaked Audio from Twitter All-Hands Call on E-Day
Project Veritas has leaked the raw audio from a Twitter “all-hands” call from April 25 – the day the Elon Musk deal went through.
It’s 45 minutes long, but here’s a two minute clip.
I didn’t listen to the entire 45 minutes, but it is fascinating to see the level of absolute devastation these people feel over the “threat” of free speech. You realize that this is a primary part of these people’s personal identity – silencing everyone who disagrees with the empire. It’s worthy of a science fiction short story – “On the Sword of Empire.” I wish I had the time for that.
I’ve run into this dealing with the censorship directly, but I think most people don’t understand that this really is a religion to these people. They worship the system, completely.
Well, the Indians don’t – they couldn’t care less. They’re just being paid as hitmen to play a role in this bizarre Jewish psychodrama. But the women especially, and the homosexual and soy-based men – the ones with the masks and the Ukrainian flags – these people quite literally worship the Beast.
They have all this cult language built up, and they behave like small kindergarten children.
A lot of feels in that conversation. Sounds like sharing circle in 3rd grade.
— Sirerp (@Sirerper) April 26, 2022
just talking without actually saying anything
— Ramboooo (@Ramboooo00) April 26, 2022
Wow. Glad they want me to “feel safer”.
— none one (@object_199) April 26, 2022
They can’t even avoid word salad gobbledygook with each other in an internal meeting.
— John Noh (@NohSpinZone) April 26, 2022
Wow, I cannot believe what I’m hearing. Moderation? It has been censorship, pure & simple. So who’s evil??
— Lynne Cosper-Lainis (@LynneCosper) April 26, 2022
They seem to be saying they decide what’s healthy and not healthy for the rest of us. A lot like Biden and Jen Psaki.
— KatieMatise (@kathym329) April 26, 2022
They refer to censorship as “moderation policies” arent they cute
— PalWeviar (@PalWeviar) April 26, 2022
The elephant in the room on social media today is that any post that creates the possibility of generating vaccine hesitancy is censored even though it is true. WTFs up with that? So social media company execs are posing as doctors now?
— Matt Blackman (@RatioTrade) April 27, 2022
Mega Cunt X-Treme Says Access to Putin’s Gas is a Human Right
Gazprom’s announcement is another attempt by Russia to blackmail us with gas.
We are prepared for this scenario. We are mapping out our coordinated EU response.
Europeans can trust that we stand united and in solidarity with the Member States impacted.
— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) April 27, 2022
It’s almost like you can’t use the word “gas” without invoking the Holocaust, even if you’re talking about a natural gas pipeline.
Are you noticing this? Is this in my mind? Or are these Jews in the media making a point to talk about “Putin’s gas” in a way that creates imagery of Auschwitz?
I mean, especially when it is that cunt Von der Leyen saying it – this bitch’s entire identity surrounds an association of her father with Adolf Hitler and a war against him. All men are her father, so all men are Hitler, therefore Putin is Hitler. Therefore, keep using the word “gas.”
Russia has been accused of seeking to blackmail the European Union as the energy giant Gazprom confirmed it had halted gas supplies to Poland and Bulgaria, prompting crisis talks in capitals across Europe.
In a statement, the Russian supplier said on Wednesday it had acted in response to the failure by the two EU countries to make their payments in roubles.
“Gazprom has completely suspended gas supplies to Bulgargaz and PGNiG due to absence of payments in roubles,” a statement issued by the company said.
Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of Russia’s lower house of parliament, the Duma, said Moscow should do the same with other “unfriendly” countries.
The immediate consequence of the move by Gazprom was a 20% rise in the wholesale gas price, putting it at almost seven times higher than a year ago.
Vladimir Putin right now be like:
It’s almost like this is all planned. It’s as if a bunch of women and faggot pederasts attempted to make moves on masculine, adult men, and they completely lost control of the situation.
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, condemned the move, saying that fellow EU countries would come to Poland and Bulgaria’s aid.
She said: “The announcement by Gazprom that it is unilaterally stopping delivery of gas to customers in Europe is yet another attempt by Russia to use gas as an instrument of blackmail.
“This is unjustified and unacceptable. And it shows once again the unreliability of Russia as a gas supplier. We are prepared for this scenario. We are in close contact with all member states.”
Bitch, you started a war.
A war that was totally against the rules.
Don’t cry about the rules.
All of the sanctions on Russia are illegal. There are no rules anymore.
This is literally Vladimir Putin right now:
Who is the real Sheriff?
No ruble no gas, how is that blackmail
— Kolobe ya Mohale (@MafambaT) April 27, 2022
Isn’t the West also “blackmailing” Russia? Not saying that what they’re doing is right; quite the contrary. But your statement is implying that Russia’s actions are unexpected / unusual, and the EU is a victim.
Please carry on, though, it’s entertaining to watch this hypocrisy.
— Mikko Revonniemi (@RevonniemiCo) April 27, 2022
You can dish it out but you can’t take it. Freezing central bank assets was a bigger crime and it makes sense that cutting off exports would be the logical response when you reduce the utility of the Euro to zero. Also I don’t think you know what the word blackmail means.
— Blackfish Sound (@SoundBlackfish) April 27, 2022
It is really unfair that they can use sanctions as well.
— Peter Pan (@PeterPa08278286) April 27, 2022
This is ironically rich after EU sanctions against Russia and theft of its assets. Hope it doesn’t get too cold during winter when Russia really decides to counter-sanction Europe.
— Robbie Ⓜ️ac (@RobbieMac592) April 27, 2022
United you freeze 😂😂
— Pasaba por aquí 🇷🇺 🇪🇸 (@ConceInvestment) April 27, 2022
We are prepared for this scenario, quickly the 5th vax….
— Vlad (@Vlad_GJB) April 27, 2022
Can you show us your message with albert bourla
— François MARQ (@MarqFrancois) April 27, 2022
We’re getting rekt in the EU because of your policies.
— Geldprinterbrrrrr (@Geldprinterbrrr) April 27, 2022
Can the Ukraine Win the War Against Free Speech?
The two most pressing issues of the day are Elon Musk’s plan to reinstate freedom of speech on Twitter and an impending war with Russia. Maybe these two issues can be tied together?
First, let’s take a trip down Memory Lane and remember how we got to the point where we are begging a billionaire to please just allow us to state our opinions in public.
The initial explanation of mass internet censorship was that people were saying mean things and that it was hurting the feelings of protected groups. In 2015, Chuck Johnson was the first person to be banned from Twitter for political reasons. That was followed shortly thereafter by the banning of MILO. Both were banned for allegedly hurting the feelings of black people. Daily Stormer was banned from everything in 2017, ostensibly for joking about a morbidly obese woman dying at the Charlottesville rally. Alex Jones was banned from YouTube and Facebook for allegedly hurting the feelings of Sandy Hook parents, and then banned from Twitter for allegedly hurting the feelings of a journalist who was working to get him banned from everything.
The word “safety” was then introduced into the discourse by every Silicon Valley mega corporation. This was apparently derived from the term “safe space,” which was a buzzword used at universities and in HR departments to denote a special area where allegedly oppressed persons were able to flee from harmful “triggering” words, ideas, or people. The idea was that certain ideas caused oppressed people – women, racial minorities, and paraphiliacs – to become emotionally unstable, and that this emotional instability was dangerous. The entire mainstream internet quickly became a “safe space” for all of these groups, which meant that you were not allowed to say anything they did not like.
Of course, that was all a massive and ridiculous ruse. The actual force behind the censorship was the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish and Israeli lobbying group. The ADL was going around threatening companies with defamation for years if they didn’t engage in mass censorship of “hate speech.” The group is obviously worried exclusively about the threat of people riling up the population against the Jews by posting information about them, but since the Jews are the single wealthiest and most powerful group in the world, demanding exclusive protection for the Jews from “harmful speech” would have been ridiculous. For this reason, the ADL and the larger Jewish lobby dragged in all of these other groups to use as human shields, demanding protections for “women, people of color, and the LGBTQ+ community.”
The ADL’s demands against Silicon Valley with regards to mass censorship go back over a decade. I remember them heating up in 2014, when then ADL chief Abe Foxman began publicly demanding that Facebook remove pages criticizing the Jews. Here is an article he wrote at the time for CNET, whining about how Mark Zuckerberg would not censor “racist speech and hateful propaganda, including Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism.”
Johnson and MILO were banned for alleged anti-black speech during the first round of Black Lives Matter, and several others deemed “too extreme” were picked off over a period of a couple years. However, it was not really until the election of Trump, and then Charlottesville, that the ADL was really able to get its hooks into Silicon Valley. Along with the moral panics over Trump and “white supremacy,” there were sub-panics relating to “fake news,” the most prominent of which was Pizzagate, which spun into the QAnon disinformation threat.
The claims of “fake news” were ultimately more damaging to perceptions of what it means to live in a free society than “hate speech” claims. The claim was that citizens – people who vote, who ostensibly have the wherewithal to decide who runs the government – were incapable of looking at different types of ideas and drawing conclusions about them, and therefore needed to be babysat by multinational corporations.
Once again, it was the Jewish lobby that presented the concept of “fact checkers” to decide whose news items people were allowed to consume. FactCheck.org had been founded all the way back in 2003 by the Annenberg Foundation, a Jewish activist and lobbying group run by the Annenberg family. In September of 2017, as politically biased “fact-checking” was becoming key to censorship, the Association for Psychological Science published a paper from the Annenberg Public Policy Center giving instructions on how to most effectively “fact-check.” This was effectively a guidebook that was then followed by Snopes and other fact-checkers.
With the ADL already heavily involved in regulating speech on all major platforms via “Trust and Safety Committees,” these alleged checkers of facts – primarily FactCheck.org and Snopes – were contracted out as “third-party” censors. The tech companies would point to fact checks as a reason for deleting articles, banning accounts, or simply “deranking” (shadowbanning) the content in question. It goes without saying that very few actual facts were checked, and that the supposed fact checkers understood that their role was to simply declare that whatever the New York Times said was the de facto word of God.
By the time the alleged coronavirus pandemic began, people were already adapted to the idea that entire categories of thought could be banned. Under the virus regime, the media introduced the idea of banning “medical disinformation.” The assertion here was once again that “safety” was at stake, because people could read wrong information, act on it, and then die from the coronavirus. During the supposed pandemic, these “fact-checkers” would simply take the word of the CDC, the WHO, and Anthony Fauci as the final word on the facts. Through this third-party fact-checker censorship mechanism, any disagreement with the government on the death toll, masks, and the vaccine was banned. At one point, Trump retweeted a screenshot from the CDC website relating to comorbidities, and it was deleted on the basis of fact-checkers having determined that it was “taken out of context.”
We all remember how we were told the vaccine would stop all transmission and prevent infection, then told that actually it didn’t do either of those things, but it was still very important to take it, because the experts said so. Last year, during the height of the virus hype, the Biden Administration admitted that they were working directly with Silicon Valley corporations to silence people who questioned the effectiveness of the vaccine.
Peter Doocy just destroyed the White House’s calls for censorship of “disinformation” on live TV.
Psaki did not see this one coming.
Watch the entire video. pic.twitter.com/ITPrMfdPFW
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 16, 2021
Then, earlier this year, Jen Psaki went on to demand that Joe Rogan be banned for having questioned the danger posed by the virus and the effectiveness of the vaccine.
Tucker Carlson slams Psaki for calling for censorship of Joe Rogan’s podcast. pic.twitter.com/G1zW1ZFoeQ
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) February 8, 2022
So, at this point, you no longer had simply massive corporations protecting the feelings of oppressed minorities, or protecting the feeble minds of the citizenry from unsafe ideas, but the government itself engaged in direct censorship. This is obviously illegal, but there aren’t really any checks left in terms of what the American government is allowed to do to the American people.
Then we get to the Russian invasion of the Ukraine in February of this year, and the biggest censorship campaign thus far. The censorship of any information about what is going on in the Ukraine has been more extreme than even the censorship of vaccine information. There are millions of people across the world attempting to share videos from the Ukraine, and they are consistently deleted by social media, with accounts being banned simply for supporting Russia. Moreover, all information from Russia itself is banned. The American public is not even allowed to know what the Russian government is saying about what is going on in the Ukraine. They are not allowed to see videos of mobs of Ukrainians taping people to posts, or neo-Nazis torturing people. They are not allowed to see really any video of the conflict zone at all.
TV news reporters go only to Lviv, where there isn’t a war. Granted, the Ukrainian military appears to have an actual policy of killing Western reporters; they can kill whoever they want because they know the entire Western media will blame it on Russia. (A Fox News reporter survived a Ukrainian attack on his car – his legs were blown off. It will be interesting to see if he is brave enough to speak out.) But even with on-the-ground reporters getting blown up, the media could still show footage from the conflict. The media plays clips from cellphone videos all the time. But that is all banned. No one is allowed to know what is happening in the Ukraine. You have to support the Ukraine, which is committing atrocities against its own people, and you have to believe the Ukraine is “winning the war.” You’re not allowed to hear another perspective, which means you’re not allowed to entertain any other ideas.
The thing that is so amazing about this is that the biggest censorship campaign yet does not have any explanation. Neither Twitter, nor YouTube, nor any other platform has even acknowledged that they are mass deleting videos and information from the Ukraine. They acted like banning RT was a sanction on a Russian business, as opposed to a censorship program. No accounts were given. Either they’ve censored so much they just don’t feel a need to explain themselves anymore, or not acknowledging the censorship is part of the censorship – to say “we’re censoring people who disagree with the government’s Ukraine narrative” would be to admit that there are people who disagree with the government’s Ukraine narrative. Aside from a handful of Congressmen and Rand Paul, 100% of the government supports the narrative. All of Fox News is standing with CNN in standing with Ukraine, save for Tucker Carlson. The impression is “everyone on earth agrees with this.”
This is the point at which Elon Musk made a move to buy Twitter, with the promise of giving the people total freedom of speech within the bounds of the First Amendment. What Musk appears to be doing is making a move on the entrenched power structure with an appeal to populism while he views the empire as increasingly losing control. This system is so totally based on lies that it simply could not survive a situation where people are allowed to freely speak on the most influential media platform in the world. If they didn’t need this censorship, they wouldn’t be doing it.
I have argued consistently that the entire bizarre coronavirus debacle would have been impossible without mass censorship. Very early on, myself and others documented the facts of the situation, particularly in relation to the death toll being completely faked. The authorities (who are also the “experts”) have since come out and admitted that the death toll was drastically inflated because anyone who went to the hospital for any reason was tested for the virus, and anyone who died of any cause was put down as a Covid death. This was often done even without a test. Musk himself went on Joe Rogan in May of 2020 and said all of this. Without censorship, the lockdown could have been avoided, and there never would have been a need for a vaccine at all, let alone an experimental gene therapy.
There was massive fraud in the 2020 election, but that would not have been possible without censorship. Firstly, the fraud itself would not have been possible without the coronavirus allowing for the mail-in ballots (which is where the fraud took place – not in some Kraken Chinese electronic cyber voting machine). Secondly, virtually all of Trump’s supporters were banned in the lead up to the election, and information was drastically censored in favor of the Democrats – including the censoring of the New York Post Hunter Biden laptop story, which was labeled “Russian misinformation” by the media and Biden himself. A poll showed that 16% of Biden voters would not have voted for Biden if they’d known about the laptop. This would have made even mail-in ballot fraud impossible.
Seems like a good day to remind everyone that 16% of Biden voters would NOT have voted for Biden if they had been aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story pic.twitter.com/tw1fVsucNP
— Kyle Martinsen (@KyleMartinsen_) March 17, 2022
Thirdly, after the election, everyone was banned from talking about fraud. Trump himself was of course banned. People were attempting to crowdsource the information on what had happened, and collect it to push for audits in swing states – they were just all banned. Instead, you got the Kraken (which appears to have been deliberate sabotage by Sidney Powell).
Musk clearly has his own designs on political power, as there is simply no other reason he would take this kind of risk. Even if he was doing it out of pure altruism, that altruism would have to be connected to a desire to gain some form of political power, because if he doesn’t gain political power, he will be crushed by the system.
The Twitter buyout is the biggest thing that has happened since the election of Trump, and it is arguably much more significant than the election of Trump. The empire is cracking at the seams, and actually allowing people to speak would just simply break it.
It’s a fascinating development. Musk surely has his own team behind him here, and believes he can win, or he wouldn’t be doing it. I personally have a hard time believing he can win. Either way, there is no backing down now. He will win or die. Even if he were to back down now, he has already directly assaulted the establishment, and there is no way he is going to be able to get away with that unless he is leveraging massive power against the Washington establishment.
Musk saying “haha, okay well, I’m not going to really do free speech” and the elite forgetting what he’s done would be like if you broke into someone’s house, killed the dog, tied up the family, raped the wife, and then while you were opening the safe, the cops showed up and you said “haha, I wasn’t really going to rob them” and the cops said “okay sure, no problem then – you can go.”
Can the Ukraine Win the War Against Free Speech?
We have been examining the American situation, because that is where these tech companies are and where it is all happening. However, in Europe, several countries have made it illegal to show any form of support for Russia. This includes Germany, which is threatening to put people in prison for posting the letter “Z” on the internet.
Obviously, Europe has arbitrary speech laws. They can outlaw any form of speech at any time. America on the other hand does have a very clear Constitution which says we are allowed to say what we want to say. Up until last year when Psaki admitted that the Biden people were telling social media companies to ban more people, we were in a situation of “private companies” depriving us of our rights. I have argued that the government has a duty to defend our rights, and therefore stop corporations from colluding to silence political speech. I have asked if Google has a right to quarter soldiers in my house. However in a technical, Talmudic sense, there was an argument to be made that because the government was not directly censoring people, it was somehow different.
That said: the United States has suspended the First Amendment during wartime, repeatedly. In fact, wartime censorship goes back to the foundations of America, before the Constitution was even written. During the Revolutionary War, many colonies made it illegal to support the Crown. The Sedition Act of 1798 criminalized the “writing, printing, uttering or publishing [of] any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings about the government of the United States.” This law was used to shut down newspapers. During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln seized the telegraph lines, and people were arrested and imprisoned for supporting the Confederacy. Many newspapers were shut down, including the Chicago Times, for criticizing Lincoln. People were arrested for simply displaying Confederate flags. A Democrat politician was imprisoned for calling Lincoln “King Lincoln” and criticizing the war. During World War I, the Sedition Act of 1918 suspended the First Amendment. Same thing. Newspapers shut down, people prosecuted for questioning politicians. Then, the day after Pearl Harbor, Franklin D. Roosevelt gave J. Edgar Hoover “emergency powers” to shut down newspapers.
The first war where speech wasn’t silenced through some direct action by the government was Korea – also the first war with no real stakes. Obviously, no one was prosecuted for supporting Saddam Hussein or the Taliban.
An open war with Russia would be existential, and there is a 100% chance that Congress would cite historical precedent and pass a very serious sedition act. Of course, you all know what this would mean: it wouldn’t simply be a ban on posting “Z” or saying you support Russia – it would be a ban on literally everything. Because since 2016, everything that the Democrats do not like has been labeled “Russian disinformation.” It’s the perfect setup. Russia hacked the 2016 election. The fact-checkers said that Hunter Biden’s laptop was from Russia, so they shut it down so the Russians didn’t hack it again. Pizzagate was from Russia. Anti-vax was from Russia. Russia created the Alt-Right. Russia is the master of Alex Jones. Russia promotes masculinity and going to the gym.
Putin has said he will launch hypersonic missiles at Europe if NATO invades the Ukraine. But if NATO doesn’t invade, this Ukraine thing is going to be wrapping up pretty soon, and the entire Western apparatus will be left trying to explain why they told everyone the Ukraine was somehow going to repel the Russian army.
At the very least, the threat of Elon Musk bringing free speech to Twitter, along with all of the other extraordinary domestic power the very unpopular US government could wield during wartime, is a very good reason to escalate rather than back down.
Charlie Kirk Comes Out in Defense of White People…!
There is an undeniable War on White People in The West.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 28, 2022
Hail Charlie Kirk!
Hail Our People!
But seriously: I don’t think I can ever trust Charlie Kirk on anything at all after the Groyper War, when he showed himself to be without scruples in terms of his willingness to push an Israeli-Jewish and homosexual agenda.
However: it says something that he’s saying it, no?
That Marine Who Got Canceled While Fighting for “Ukraine” People was Working for a Mercenary Company
When the story appeared yesterday, I thought this Marine who got canceled in the Ukraine was just a redditor.
He was apparently working for a PMC (private military contractor), which was presumably an American company.
An American citizen and Marine veteran, Willy Joseph Cancel, died fighting alongside Ukrainian forces in Ukraine, the man’s widow confirmed to Fox News Digital early Friday morning.
“My husband did die in Ukraine,” Brittany Cancel, the widow of the 22-year-old Marine veteran, told Fox News Digital. “He went there wanting to help people, he had always felt that that was his main mission in life.”
Cancel leaves behind his wife and a 7-month-old son. He appears to be the first U.S. citizen to die while fighting alongside Ukrainians in Ukraine.
“My husband was very brave and a hero,” Cancel said. “I did not expect to be a widow at 23 years old or for our son to be without a father. All I want is for him to come home, and to give him the proper burial he deserves.”
The Marine veteran signed up to work for a private military contracting company on top of his full-time job as a corrections officer shortly before the war in Ukraine broke out at the end of February, Willy Cancel’s mother, Rebecca Cabrera, told CNN. After the war began, the company asked for contractors to fight in Ukraine and Cancel agreed to go, the mother said. Cabrera did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment.
Your husband was not a hero, he was literally a mercenary roflmao. No one thinks mercenaries are heroes. Why don’t you watch a Hollywood movie some time, you stupid whore.
They used to be called “soldiers of fortune” and “men with no country.” There’s an old folk song…
“We’ll fight for no country, but we’ll die for good pay, under the flag of the greenback dollar or the peso down Mexico way.”
The song references Americans hired by the revolutionary Mexican serial killer Pancho Villa – who actually invaded Columbus, New Mexico and killed 17 Americans, resulting in the Americans sending Black Jack Pershing to hunt him down.
Should I post the folk song about that?
That is definitely not the first time mercenaries joined a military that was killing people from their own country. Mercenary fighting is literally the opposite of being a hero. It is scum work, like drug dealing. In terms of reputation, mercenaries are much lower than hookers. At least hookers don’t hurt anyone.
Calling a mercenary a “hero” is an offense to every single person who ever died in a war actually fighting for his country.
(Word is, she was having sex with other men – especially the blacks – while her husband was being paid to invade Ukraine in the name of a lawless rules-based order run by vicious Jews.)
Okay, so – wait.
The US is sending billions of dollars to the Ukraine – are they then allowed to use that money to hire US Marines working for PMC groups?
If so – LOL.
This is like some kind of “private companies can do whatever they want” on steroids.
“We didn’t invade the Ukraine – we just sent the Ukraine people money so they could hire former Marines working as mercenaries from our country to go fight in their country.”
I can’t find out what company he was working for. I think that would be findable if it was available. Maybe Max Blumenthal will figure it out. It doesn’t appear that this was announced by anyone other than the merc’s mother. But I think it is fair to assume it was an American company.
Russia kept calling the so-called “foreign legion” “mercenaries,” but those faggots from reddit were all literally volunteering.
How many American PMCs are there in the Ukraine? Shouldn’t this data be available?
This is definitely “the US sending troops to the Ukraine.” Using some convoluted thing where “we sent them money to pay us to send soldiers there, which is totally different from just sending unpaid soldiers there, because it’s not the government doing it” is just… that hurts my brain to even think about.
For those who don’t see the analogy: this is the same thing they did with the First Amendment, where all of these companies that are contracting with the United States government are censoring people, but the government says that doesn’t violate the First Amendment because it’s private companies doing it.
At one point I said: “The US is performing the weirdness on the world stage,” and talked about how they think destroying Russia is like censoring people on the internet. Taking “it’s not censorship if private companies are doing it” and turning it into “it’s not war if private companies are doing it” is beyond the pale.
In theory, the US Marines could be handing out information to US Marines about how they could be discharged from the military upon request if they agreed to sign up for a PMC and fight in the Ukraine (for much higher pay than the Marines, of course), give the Ukraine money to pay for these soldiers, and move an entire army into the Ukraine.
The similarity of thought between this and privatizing the entire internet and censoring everyone and then saying “but it’s not the government tho” cannot be stressed enough. The people running the US government (whoever that is – we do not really have any idea) are using all of these strategies used against the domestic population against Russia.
Maybe if Ned Price just keeps saying “rules-based order” over and over again, this will all seem acceptable to Americans.
But for the rest of the world, the idea of sending a country money to hire government-trained mercenaries from your country being fundamentally different from sending your military to aid them is not actually any different than sending in troops. It’s a “distinction without a difference,” as they say.
Someone should ask Ned Price how many US-military trained marines are fighting in the Ukraine. It also seems fair we should know if the US is subsidizing the companies sending the mercenaries or if they’re just giving the “Ukraine” people money to pay them.
Either way – we need to have some kind of information about how exactly this is different from “boots on the ground,” which we’ve been promised would not happen.
How can the world tolerate the lawlessness of this rules-based order?
When Do They Say “The United States is at War with Russia”?
— Department of Defense 🇺🇸 (@DeptofDefense) April 29, 2022
How far can they push this without admitting that the United States government is at war with Russia?
Pretty far, apparently.
Ukrainian military personnel are receiving American training in Europe amid the conflict with Russia, Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby has revealed.
“I can announce that the United States has commenced training with the Ukrainian Armed Forces on key systems at US military installations in Germany,” Kirby said during a briefing on Friday.
As part of the program, coordinated with Berlin, the Ukrainian troops are learning to operate artillery, radars and armored vehicles.
“This new training effort in Germany and at other locations in Europe is in direct support of recent US security assistance packages that are designed to help Ukraine win their battles today and build strength for tomorrow,” the spokesman said, noting that the US has committed $4.3 billion to the Ukrainian military since 2021.
Kirby stressed that the Pentagon has no plans to send its instructors into Ukraine. “The training that we’ll do will be outside of” the country, he said.
But the possibility of servicemen inside Ukraine receiving American training “virtually” is being explored, he added.
“We’re only training them inside the Ukraine over Zoom.”
After making these strange claims, the faggot John Kirby, who is well known to suck a mean cock, started fake crying like a bitch.
(Not a joke. I mean, this guy is a joke and a freak, but he literally started crying.)
The typically stoic Pentagon spokesman John Kirby gets choked up talking about the images of Russian “depravity” coming out of Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/c044G6wBaa
— Caitlin Doornbos (@CaitlinDoornbos) April 29, 2022
Imagine, if you will, a rules-based order based on grown adult men in their sixties crying in public over their own atrocity hoaxes.
The rules are: men in their sixties start crying in public. That’s who we are.
Gregorian Chants for Prayer
Maybe some people feel unmotivated to pray every day or do not fully get into the process. I have found that certain music can help, and the best, at least for beginners, is Gregorian chants.
The natural best prayer is in nature, alone, in the silence with only the sound of the animals. However, most of us do not live in nature, and I find that without that silent, clean, pure peace that comes from a natural environment, listening to recorded prayer music can assist in the prayer process.
All of the traditional Gregorian chants are similar and repetitive by nature, so for the most part, anything labeled as a “Gregorian chant” will do. The above embed has something more than the chants, and is more of a “vibe” track. (I think this is fine and God will not resent you for listening to the one with some music.) This can also be used to clear the mind.
The pure chants are much better once you are familiar, though the above is more accessible. Here is a pure chant. (This one has track breaks, which many of the modernized versions do not have. However, it is a good example – you should become familiar with the music and make your own decisions.)
These songs can make a place in an otherwise godless environment feel holy.
Remember: first and foremost of anything you will do in your life is your relationship with God. This comes before sex and family, and even before physical health. I have always stated that people must put their health first, and I believe that this is incontrovertibly true, but improving your spiritual health will assist in improving your physical health. If you are fat or otherwise gross, you must remove the gluttony and sloth, but prayer should accompany diet and exercise either way. That is to say: if you are fat, don’t wait until you are fit to prioritize your relationship with God.
We all know that the most hideous, fat filth we encounter is godless. The fat women and pudgy skinnyfat faggots are an abomination before the Lord. The spirit of God IS the spirit of health and fitness, for God tells us that our body is a temple of the Holy Spirit.
The best day to begin a routine of prayer is always today. Whatever your denomination, you should also be taking the Eucharist as often as possible. This can only help your physical body, as there is a very direct link between the physical body and the soul that inhabits it, and God tells us to keep both of these things pure – body and soul. They are companions in this life in such a way that neither can be truly healthy without the other.
Clearly, the purity of spirit assisting in the purity of the physical body is self evident, but we also do not see very many champion athletes thanking the Big Bang Theory for their achievements. You will find that just as most fit men are right-wing, they also tend to be religious. Of course, most right-wing people tend to be religious, so all of these things are fundamentally connected to the “golden path” of life.
I will not claim that there were not good religious men that were fat, or physically fit men who were atheist – both of these things are of course possible. But on average, anyone who is spiritually healthy is going to be physically healthy, and the reverse. Just so, anyone who is physically fat is much more likely to be spiritually void, and anyone who is spiritually void is more likely to be fat.
Everyone should take note of this reality, and improve themselves as much as possible as we face these challenges.
Always remember: if you are getting physically fit, you are not doing it for women, you are doing it for yourself, and for God. If you try to get physically fit in order to appeal to women, you will find that it doesn’t really work. Yes, obviously if you are a fat blob, women will respond better to you if you lose the blobishness, but if you get into good shape, this will not be noticed or complimented by women. Men might compliment it. But everyone should go into fitness for the right reasons, and those are your own health, self-esteem, and happiness and your relationship with God, submission to Him, and service of Him.
In fact, I would argue: female approval should not be the primary driver for any behavior. First and foremost should be taking care of yourself and forming a relationship with Jesus Christ. Everything flows from that first point. After building a relationship with God, you will then be capable of leaving your sexual issues, and all of your other problems, in God’s hands.
All you can really do in this life is what is right, and that starts with purity. Physical purity comes from a good diet and exercise and spiritual purity comes from prayer and familiarity with God’s Word and the words of Holy Men.
If you have to kill people or die in the future, you will be very thankful that you have purified both body and spirit. In war, both a healthy body and a healthy soul are most important.
Remember: psychology is a pathological Jewish scam, and the only way to clear out negative thoughts is through physical and spiritual health. If you suffer from bad or negative thoughts, bypass all Jewish nonsense and focus on physical and spiritual health. “Psychological” and “mental” health are spooks, as consciousness is some combination of the body and spirit.
Intelligent people struggle more with their own mind for the simple reason that God is asking more of them. “To him much is given, much is asked.” If you are an intelligent person and suffer from negative thoughts and emotions, be aware that the only solution to this is Jesus Christ.
There is nothing to do before this: humbling yourself before God and admitting that after you were given free will, you made imperfect decisions. No one makes perfect decisions, and that is why Christ came to take the sins of the world upon himself. Free will cannot possibly lead to a finite being making only good decisions, and from this comes the need for Christ’s sacrifice.
Everything we do should be with the goal of bringing us closer to God.